Trump's attorney says bid to keep him off ballot should be tossed – Arizona Capitol Times
Howard Fischer, Capitol Media Services//October 17, 2023//
Trump’s attorney says bid to keep him off ballot should be tossed
Former President Trump speaks at a Save America rally, where he stumped for Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake, on July 22, 2022 in Prescott. An attorney for Trump now says a bid to keep him off the 2024 Arizona presidential preference ballot should be thrown out because there’s not a chance in the world that challenger John Castro could get nominated, much less elected. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)
Howard Fischer, Capitol Media Services//October 17, 2023//
An attorney for Donald Trump says a bid to keep him off the 2024 Arizona presidential preference ballot should be thrown out because there’s not a chance in the world that challenger John Castro could get nominated, much less elected.
In new court filings, Tim La Sota tells U.S. District Court Judge Douglas Rayes he has no legal authority to rule that the 14th Amendment makes the former president ineligible to be a nominee based on allegations about his activities around the Jan. 6 insurrection. In fact, the lawyer argues, that amendment about disqualifying for office anyone who engaged in insurrection or gave aid and comfort to enemies doesn’t even apply to the president.
But La Sota said there’s an even bigger problem with the lawsuit that Castro filed in federal court here. He said the challenger lacks standing to sue because he cannot show that Trump’s presence on the ballot will harm him in any way.
Castro has registered with the Federal Elections Commission as a presidential candidate. And he filed a sworn affidavit with the court saying he intends to file a petition to be on the ballot here for the March 19, 2024 race when the Arizona Secretary of State’s Office begins accepting paperwork starting Nov. 13.
La Sota sniffed at all that, saying a one-page form filed with the FEC does not confer standing to sue in federal court.
“There are currently approximately 292 individuals registered with the FEC as Republican Party candidates for the presidency,” he wrote. “Only a few of these registered ‘candidates’ will launch an actual presidential campaign.”
Then there’s the fact that Castro, by his own campaign finance reports, has not raised a single dollar in contributions from anyone in Arizona. Instead, it lists a $20 million loan to his campaign.
“Plaintiff does not allege any concrete support from anyone, let alone voters and/or political actions in this state and/or the Arizona Republican Party,” La Sota told the judge. But he said it’s not just about the money.
“Plaintiff has not identified a single voter or donor who identifies Castro as his or her ‘second choice’ after President Trump,” he said.
At best, La Sota said, Castro is claiming he has “spoken to thousands of voters who have expressed that they would vote for Castro only if Trump is not a presidential candidate.” But he said Castro has no expert or social science evidence that could support “the inherently improbable claim that there is a latent Castro movement that would surface among Arizona voters if only Trump was not on the ballot.”
The bottom line, La Sota told Rayes, is that the judge doesn’t have to accept Castro’s “implausible” claims that he is entitled to sue to keep Trump off the ballot.
“If a plaintiff were to claim that, if only the court would order that his opponent cease doing X, plaintiff would be able to float off into the air, the court is not simply required to accept that fantastic assertion as a basis for (legal) standing absent some measure of proof that the plaintiff actually would float into the air, or at least that there is a plausible basis for believing that he would,” La Sota wrote.
In his own legal filing, Castro said there is plenty of evidence he is a serious candidate — and with realistic chances.
For example, he said, while there may be 292 FEC-registered candidates for president, he is one of fewer than 10 Republicans who already have filed to be on the ballot in both Nevada and New Hampshire.
Castro pointed to similar lawsuits he has filed, including one where he has a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court. And he noted that Rayes took this case seriously enough to schedule an expedited trial.
Castro, who is representing himself, also said that Rayes doesn’t necessarily need to take his word for it that there are people who said they would vote for him if Trump is kept off the ballot.
“It is common sense that plaintiff would obtain more political support in the absence of defendant Donald John Trump, which any other Republican candidate can certainly attest to,” he said.
“Defendant Donald John Trump and plaintiff John Anthony Castro are both competing for the same voters,” he continued. “Hence, plaintiff has a political competitive injury-in-fact.”
Much of the rest of La Sota’s 35-page argument about why Rayes should throw out Castro’s case mimics arguments made by others who have faced similar lawsuits seeking to keep Trump off the ballot. These go to whether a court can enforce the 14th Amendment and that allowing or requiring Arizona officials to make such a decision would illegally be allowing states to add new qualifications on who can run for president.
But La Sota said that, regardless of what Trump did or did not do around Jan. 6, the 14th Amendment and its disqualification do not apply to his client.
He acknowledged the section does govern who can be president, vice president or a member of Congress. La Sota pointed out, however, that disqualification applies only to anyone who had “previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States.”
“The phrase ‘officers of the United States’ does not include the president,” he argued.
His proof?
La Sota said everyone on that list takes an oath to “support the Constitution of the United States.” By contrast, he said, the president vows to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
“It establishes that the drafters of the 14th Amendment did not understand the president to be an officer of the United States,” he said.
Rayes has not set a deadline to reach a decision.
Share this!
An Arizona man whose 6-year-old son died of starvation after being locked in a tiny closet has been assigned a[…]
October 23, 2023
Former state Sen. Otoniel “Tony” Navarrete is currently on trial for a series of sexual crimes against chi[…]
October 18, 2023
Arizona counties are prohibited by law from hand-counting all ballots in an election, even if they want to do […]
October 18, 2023
Abe Hamadeh has been ordered to pay more than $42,000 in legal fees to Kris Mayes in his unsuccessful effort t[…]
October 17, 2023
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously struck down former gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake and former[…]
October 16, 2023
The highly anticipated trial of former Sen. Otoniel “Tony” Navarrete went forward on Thursday morning with[…]
October 12, 2023
Sign up for your daily digest of Arizona
A federal judge modified an order levied on the city of Phoenix to allow the city more leeway in enf[…]
Maricopa County set a new record Thursday for annual heat-associated deaths, with 425 tallied so far[…]
The announcement from four-term U.S. Rep. Debbie Lesko, R-Peoria, that she is not seeking reelection[…]
Arizona lawmakers voted on party lines for a new House speaker Tuesday, but it was not enough to ove[…]
State lawmakers are free to shield bar owners and bartenders from liability when customers they serv[…]
Antibodies found in early results of a historic new vaccine trial are expected to give endangered Ca[…]
A settlement filed Monday in a long-running lawsuit over the Trump administration’s separation of pa[…]
The Arizona Green Party is collecting signatures to register as a new party after losing party recog[…]
Arizona Capitol Times provides 24/7 business news coverage and events honoring top business professionals.
Get our free e-alerts & breaking news notifications!
Subscribe for access to the latest digital and special editions.
© 2023 BridgeTower Media. All rights reserved.
Use of this website is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Your California Privacy Rights/Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Info/Cookie Policy