Trump Fails to Get N.Y. Hush-Money Case Dismissed, as Judge Gears Up for March Trial – Just Security

A chronicle of Donald Trump's Crimes or Allegations

Trump Fails to Get N.Y. Hush-Money Case Dismissed, as Judge Gears Up for March Trial – Just Security

by
February 15, 2024
, , , , ,
by
February 15, 2024
The criminal case against former President Donald Trump for allegedly falsifying business records to smother a scandal during the 2016 presidential election remains on course for a March trial, as a Manhattan judge on Thursday refused to dismiss his 34-count felony indictment.
Minutes after proceedings began, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan announced that he had decided to deny Trump’s motion to dismiss and would resume jury selection as scheduled on March 25. 
Merchan signaled that he expected the trial to last six weeks.
Spanning a little more than 90 minutes, Thursday morning’s hearing followed the announcement of Trump’s legal defeat with wrangling over preparations for trial next month, including jury selection and the remainder of pre-trial discovery. Trump’s lead attorney Todd Blanche repeatedly complained about the judge’s adherence to the trial schedule as his client tries to notch the Republican nomination. Blanche said the conflict was “something that should not happen in this country.”
The argument appeared to wear on the judge’s patience.
“Okay, what’s your legal argument?” Merchan prodded, toward the end of the hearing. 
“That’s not a legal argument,” he added later. 
At other moments in the hearing, Merchan sharply directed Blanche not to interrupt him and ordered him to be seated. The judge did not describe the particulars of his ruling from the bench, instead releasing a 30-page decision and order broadly advancing Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case.
The first of four indictments brought against the former president, Bragg’s charges against Trump relate to the former president’s alleged role in disguising a $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels before the 2016 presidential election. In 2018, Trump’s former personal attorney Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to violating federal election law through that hush-money transfer, which he masked through a complicated system involving a home equity loan funneled through a shell company to Daniels’ lawyer.
Before Cohen’s sentencing, federal prosecutors found that Cohen made those payments “in coordination with and at the direction of” Trump, but the Department of Justice did not indict the former president in connection with that scheme. 
Trump had complained about the more than half-decade interval between Cohen’s prosecution and his own charges, seeking dismissal on the grounds of “pre-indictment delay.” 
In his ruling, Merchan said he “agreed” with the prosecution that the pause was justified by the “complex investigation.” 
“Further, while it is true that the charges involve the lowest level felony and no one suffered physical harm, it can hardly be said that the allegations are not severe,” the judge noted, summarizing allegations that Trump engaged in “an effort to influence the 2016 Presidential election” in a scheme to “cover up” his payoff. 
“In this Court’s view, those are serious allegations,” Merchan added.
In his New York case, Trump stands accused of falsifying business records to cover up reimbursing Cohen to the tune of $420,000, grossed up to account for interest on the loan and supposed “tech” services. Manhattan prosecutors allege Trump paid out the reimbursements in monthly installments of $35,000, leading to dozens of charges. While the alleged deceptions involving the documents themselves are misdemeanors,  they can become felonies if performed in the commission of other offenses.
Prosecutors argued that Trump deceived voters, in violation of state and federal election law, by avoiding negative press on the cusp of the 2016 election — and misled New York tax authorities about the nature of Cohen’s payments.
Merchan allowed prosecutors to advance three of four theories of the case, accusing Trump of violating federal election law, state election law, and the tax fraud statute.
The Judge ruled against the district attorney on one theory of the case, potentially limiting prosecutors from telling jurors about a separate hush-money payment to former Playboy model Karen McDougal. Under that theory, prosecutors would have argued that Trump intended to falsify business records to cover up a plan by the National Enquirer’s parent company America Media Incorporated (AMI) to purchase McDougal’s story and refuse to print it, in what has been called a “catch-and-kill” scheme. (In 2018, AMI entered into a non-prosecution agreement allowing the company to avoid company finance charges.)  The judge indicated prosecutors might still be able to include some of the alleged facts involving the AMI arrangement under other theories, including the intent to violate election laws.
 In September, Trump’s attorneys, Todd Blanche and Susan Necheles, previewed their defense in a motion seeking the case’s dismissal, ridiculing the indictment as a “zombie case” revived to selectively prosecute their client.
In his various civil and criminal cases, Trump has claimed to be the target of selective prosecution, in a refrain that has boosted fundraising from his supporters — but has not yet prevailed in any court. Two levels of New York courts rejected Trump’s claims that New York Attorney General Letitia James brought the civil fraud case against him, his adult children, and his companies to fulfill a campaign promise. 
Trump’s similar claim against Bragg fared no better, and it relied heavily on a book published by the DA’s former deputy Mark Pomerantz, who resigned in a letter complaining about a decision not to prosecute the former president for financial offenses.
This, Trump’s counsel argued, built up pressure for the Democratic DA to bring a different case, but the judge found that the former president’s arguments “strain credulity.”
“The Defendant has not overcome the presumption that the People’s prosecution of this matter was undertaken in good faith and without discrimination,” Merchan’s ruling stated.
Trump and the district attorney disputed the questions to be included on the jury questionnaire, with the former president’s lawyers attempting to elicit detailed information about the candidate’s political opinions and ties. The proposed questions scrutinize the potential jurors’ media consumption and involvement in the “QAnon movement, Proud Boys, antifa, and any other anarchist groups.” 
Such questions, one of the prosecutors noted, helped weed out juror bias in E. Jean Carroll’s second defamation trial against Trump, which resulted in a $88.3 million judgment.
The judge did not yet rule on or release those questions, before the hearing adjourned.
Though his attorneys’ arguments broadly failed in court, Trump came ahead with one person in the courtroom gallery, who started clapping before security officers silenced the spectator. An otherwise expressionless Trump was spotted cracking a smile at that outburst.
Read the judge’s ruling here.
(Editor’s note: Readers may be interested in Just Security’s Survey of Past New York Felony Prosecutions for Falsifying Business Records.)
, , , , ,
All-source, public repository of congressional hearing transcripts, government agency documents, digital forensics, social media analysis, public opinion surveys, empirical research, more.
by , , and
Feb 15th, 2024
by , , and
Feb 14th, 2024
by
Feb 13th, 2024
by and
Feb 10th, 2024
by
Feb 6th, 2024
by
Feb 5th, 2024
by and
Feb 1st, 2024
by
Jan 31st, 2024
by
Jan 30th, 2024
by
Jan 26th, 2024
by and
Jan 26th, 2024
by and
Jan 25th, 2024
by
Jan 24th, 2024
by
Jan 22nd, 2024
by
Jan 19th, 2024
by and
Jan 12th, 2024
by and
Jan 12th, 2024
by
Jan 11th, 2024
by
Jan 10th, 2024
by and
Jan 10th, 2024
by , and
Jan 9th, 2024
by and
Jan 8th, 2024
by and
Jan 6th, 2024
by
Jan 5th, 2024
by and
Jan 4th, 2024
by and
Jan 2nd, 2024
by
Dec 29th, 2023
by and
Dec 22nd, 2023
by
Dec 15th, 2023
by , and
Dec 12th, 2023
by
Dec 2nd, 2023
by
Nov 30th, 2023
by and
Nov 28th, 2023
by and
Nov 27th, 2023
by
Nov 21st, 2023
by
Nov 16th, 2023
by
Nov 13th, 2023
by , and
Nov 10th, 2023
by
Nov 9th, 2023
by , , , , and
Nov 8th, 2023
by and
Nov 7th, 2023
by and
Nov 7th, 2023
by , and
Nov 3rd, 2023
by
Nov 2nd, 2023
by
Nov 1st, 2023
by
Oct 31st, 2023
by
Oct 26th, 2023
by
Oct 24th, 2023
by and
Oct 19th, 2023
by
Oct 18th, 2023
by
Oct 18th, 2023
by , and
Oct 17th, 2023
by
Oct 13th, 2023
by
Oct 13th, 2023
by
Oct 11th, 2023
by
Oct 11th, 2023
by and
Oct 9th, 2023
by and
Oct 6th, 2023
by and
Oct 5th, 2023
by
Oct 4th, 2023
by
Oct 4th, 2023
by
Oct 3rd, 2023
by
Sep 27th, 2023
by , and
Sep 27th, 2023
by
Sep 26th, 2023
by
Sep 25th, 2023
by , and
Sep 22nd, 2023
by and
Sep 18th, 2023
by and
Sep 15th, 2023
by
Sep 15th, 2023
by and
Sep 14th, 2023
by
Sep 12th, 2023
by
Sep 11th, 2023
by
Sep 11th, 2023
by
Sep 5th, 2023
by and
Sep 1st, 2023
by
Aug 31st, 2023
by , and
Aug 30th, 2023
by
Aug 28th, 2023
by , , , , , and
Aug 25th, 2023
by and
Aug 25th, 2023
by
Aug 24th, 2023
by
Aug 22nd, 2023
by
Aug 21st, 2023
by
Aug 21st, 2023
by
Aug 18th, 2023
by , , , and
Aug 16th, 2023
by
Aug 16th, 2023
by
Aug 15th, 2023
by
Aug 15th, 2023
by
Aug 14th, 2023
by
Aug 9th, 2023
by and
Aug 9th, 2023
by
Aug 8th, 2023
by and
Aug 8th, 2023
by
Aug 7th, 2023
by
Aug 3rd, 2023
by
Jul 31st, 2023
by and
Jul 31st, 2023
by and
Jul 30th, 2023
by , and
Sep 27th, 2023
by
Jan 11th, 2024
by , and
Jan 30th, 2023
by and
Nov 18th, 2022
by , , , , , , and
Oct 27th, 2022
by
Oct 31st, 2023
by
Oct 18th, 2023
by
Sep 11th, 2023
by
Jul 17th, 2023
by
May 9th, 2023
by , , , , , , and
Feb 13th, 2023
by and
Jan 26th, 2023
by and
Jan 4th, 2023
by and
Nov 18th, 2022
by
Oct 10th, 2022
by
Oct 25th, 2022
by
Sep 20th, 2022
by and
Mar 24th, 2022
by and
Aug 15th, 2022
by
Feb 18th, 2022
by
Jan 24th, 2022
by , , , and
Jan 20th, 2022
by , and
Oct 29th, 2021
by
Sep 13th, 2021
by , and
Sep 7th, 2021
by
Jul 19th, 2021
by
Jun 30th, 2021
by and
Jun 14th, 2021
by and
Jun 1st, 2021
Adam Klasfeld (@KlasfeldReports) is a Fellow at Just Security.
Send A Letter To The Editor
by , , and
Feb 15th, 2024
by , , and
Feb 15th, 2024
by , , and
Feb 15th, 2024
by , , and
Feb 15th, 2024
by , , and
Feb 15th, 2024
by , , and
Feb 14th, 2024
by and
Feb 14th, 2024
by , and
Feb 8th, 2024
by , and
Feb 6th, 2024
by , and
Jan 9th, 2024
by , , , and
Dec 19th, 2023
by , , and
Dec 11th, 2023
Just Security is based at the Reiss Center on Law and Security at New York University School of Law.

source